Steve Whitmire singing Rubber Duckie!!! They usually use the Jim Henson vocal track…

nevertoooldtolovemuppets:

Ernie singing Rubber Duckie at Carnegie today.

gregcallus:

There are skeptics who don’t think much will come out of the Leveson Inquiry. Guido Fawkes told Leveson LJ that the true test would be prosecutions arising out of Operation Motorman, and Hugh Grant will seemingly not be satisfied until there’s a statutory regime for regulating Twitter. Everyone…

(Source: chotpot)

iamateenagefeminist:

homoarigato:

Good for you. Want a cookie?

Ahhhh, I love these so much.

HAVE ALL OF THE COOKIES

Trying to rewire something in Doctor Who: Worlds in Time.

timeywimeygirl:

HOW THE HELL?!?!

sweetupndown:

you thought I didn’t really notice. But I did. I wanted to high-five you. Yesterday I had a pair of brothers in my store. One was maybe between 15-17. He was a wrestler at the local high school. Kind of tall, stocky and handsome. He had a younger brother, who was maybe about 10-12 years old. The…

(Source: sweetupndown9)

ladiesmakingcomics:

How media clearly reflects the sexism and the racism we cannot see in ourselves.

I wanted my first-year film students to understand what happens to a story when actual human beings inhabit your characters, and the way they can inspire storytelling. And I wanted to teach them how to look at…

(Source: letthetruthlaugh)

noelclarke:

AMY WINEHOUSE

(Before we start, i did NOT know Amy, these are my thoughts)

All I see when I look at the above picture of Amy Winehouse is a girl with hope. A beautiful girl, with hope, love, and passion for her music.

Someone so gifted that she’ll still be spoken about in 100 years time, although I hope she’s remembered for this pic and her music not the way the press hounded her and made her look.

I’ve seen and heard a lot of cunts talking about how she did drugs and got what was coming. NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO… She did NOT get what was coming. Addiction is a dangerous thing that can’t be controlled it is an illness. Now don’t get me wrong I don’t do any drugs, never have, it’s just not me, but I don’t judge others on what they do, when I’m not in their shoes.

“It’s easy to talk about what you think is happening on top of the mountain when you haven’t even started climbing it yet”.

What I can say is this. Being in the public eye and I probably get 00.01% (if that) of the attention she got, it can be a very stressful.

It doesn’t matter what day I’m having. I have to smile at people that approach me, I have to listen to people tell me they want my email to send me a script cos they know a guy that knows my friend personally and because of that they thought I’d read it. I have to take the 10 CD’s I’m handed a day of some guys mixtape, and when only 1 can get on a film that’s 9 other people that suddenly are hating. I have to take abuse online and am not supposed to speak back. I have to stop and sign autographs when I’m eating with my family, or in hospital with my son, because if I don’t I’m the dickhead, and sometimes it can get on top.

So you find other ways to stay in your world where you can just be you, you find those places and those people and those things you enjoy just to escape the white noise… and that time becomes everything to you. Amy needed space and time to be on her own to just be Amy… not Amy Winehouse, but was never left alone.

And don’t gimme that shit about we choose this life. You think I care about been known. I don’t. I care about my work. You think Amy just wanted to be famous? No, I doubt she did. She wanted to fucking sing songs, and damn it, she did. Better than most people ever will.

So fuck anyone that say’s she deserved it or should have been more responsible. The pressure of her life must have been immense, I’ve heard a lot of people talking about how if they had this or that and had her life they would be so happy and embrace it, and do the right thing.

But the truth is you have no idea how you’ll handle it. Because when you are on camera, when you are part of public awareness, at the lowest level like me or a A-list level like her it’s something you just can’t understand or know how you will deal with until you experience it.

So all you twisted fucks that said anything negative, said anything about her without the slightest speck of understanding of what it’s like. I don’t wish anything bad on you… In fact.

I wish you all the success in the world…

miniar:

 

This has been a great year for male writers, with women shunted aside for major prizes and all-new hand-wringing about why it is so. Because, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but male writers get taken more seriously. Also, stories about men, even if written by women, are considered mainstream, while stories about women are “women’s fiction.” This despite the fact that women read more than men, and write more, and are over-represented generally throughout publishing.

As the father of two girls, one aged five and one ten months, I know why. It’s because of dogs and Smurfs. I can’t understand why no-one else realizes this. I see these knotted-brow articles and the writers seem truly perplexed. Dogs and Smurfs: that’s the answer.

Let me walk you through it. We’ll start with dogs. I have written about this before, but to save you the click: people assume dogs are male. Listen out for it: you will find it’s true. To short-cut the process, visit the zoo, because when I say “dogs,” I really mean, “all animals except maybe cats.” The air of a zoo teems with “he.” I have stood in front of baboons with teats like missile launchers and heard adults exclaim to their children, “Look at him!” Once I saw an unsuspecting monkey taken from behind and there was a surprised silence from the crowd and then someone made a joke about sodomy. People assume animals are male. If you haven’t already noticed this, it’s only because it’s so pervasive. We also assume people are male, unless they’re doing something particularly feminine; you’ll usually say “him” about an unseen car driver, for example. But it’s ubiquitous in regard to animals.

Now, kids like animals. Kids really fucking like animals. Kids are little animal stalkers, fascinated by absolutely anything an animal does. They read books about animals. I just went through my daughter’s bookshelves, and they all have animals on the cover. Animals everywhere. And because publishing is terribly progressive, and because Jen and I look out for it, a lot of those animals are girls. But still: a ton of boys. Because of the assumption.

Here’s an example: a truly great kids’ book is Lost and Found by Oliver Jeffers. I love this story, but on page 22, after being called “it” three times, an otherwise sexless penguin twice becomes “he.” This would never, ever happen the other way around. The only reason a penguin can abruptly become male in an acclaimed children’s book without anybody noticing is because we had already assumed it was.

Then you’ve got Smurf books. Not actual Smurfs. I mean stories where there are five major characters, and one is brave and one is smart and one is grumpy and one keeps rats for pets and one is a girl. Smurfs, right? Because there was Handy Smurf and Chef Smurf and Dopey Smurf and Painter Smurf and ninety-four other male Smurfs and Smurfette. Smurfette’s unique personality trait was femaleness. That was the thing she did better than anyone else. Be a girl.

Smurf books are not as common as they used to be, but Smurf stories are, oddly, everywhere on the screen. Pixar makes practically nothing else. I am so disappointed by this, because they make almost every kids’ film worth watching. WALL-E is good. I will grant them WALL-E, because Eve is so awesome. But otherwise: lots of Smurfs.

Male is default. That’s what you learn from a world of boy dogs and Smurf stories. My daughter has no problem with this. She reads these books the way they were intended: not about boys, exactly, but about people who happen to be boys. After years of such books, my daughter can happily identify with these characters.

And this is great. It’s the reason she will grow into a woman who can happily read a novel about men, or watch a movie in which men do all the most interesting things, without feeling like she can’t relate. She will process these stories as being primarily not about males but about human beings.

Except it’s not happening the other way. The five-year-old boy who lives up the street from me does not have a shelf groaning with stories about girl animals. Because you have to seek those books out, and as the parent of a boy, why would you? There are so many great books about boys to which he can relate directly. Smurf stories must make perfect sense to him: all the characters with this one weird personality trait to distinguish them, like being super brave or smart or frightened or a girl.

I have been told that this is a good thing for girls. “That makes girls more special,” said this person, who I wanted to punch in the face. That’s the problem. Being female should not be special. It should be normal. It is normal, in the real world. There are all kinds of girls. There are all kinds of women. You just wouldn’t think so, if you only paid attention to dogs and Smurfs.

Is it the positive role model thing? Because I don’t want only positive female role models. I want the spectrum. Angry girls, happy girls, mean girls. Lazy girls. Girls who lie and girls who hit people and do the wrong thing sometimes. I’m pretty sure my daughters can figure out for themselves which personality aspects they should emulate, if only they see the diversity.

It’s not like this is hard. Dogs and Smurfs: we’re not talking about searing journeys to the depths of the soul. An elephant whose primary story purpose is to steal some berries does not have to be male. Not every time. Characters can be girls just because they happen to be girls.

P.S. Don’t talk to me about Sassette. Sassette was like the three millionth Smurf invented. You get no credit for that.

quipproquo:

whocrafts:

Mini David Tennant Commission (by deadly_sweet)

love.

Since I started dating a paralyzed guy (who’s rather fond of wheelchair-using Oracle since he’s also a computer geek, causing me to nickname him Boy Oracle), I’ve had the opportunity to talk to a number of other wheelchair users who all admire Oracle for being a perfectly strong, capable woman who happens to be paralyzed. Her presentation as a strong and beautiful woman is empowering for wheelchair users. Go to disabilities forums and see how many women sport her as their avatar. Go to cosplay websites and see how many women in wheelchairs happily represent Oracle at cons and even do photoshoots in character, proudly displaying the FACT that someone can be disabled and still be attractive and strong. Look at blogs like the one Benicio has linked and see how greatly that representation for wheelchair users and other disabled people is needed. Look at the debates about her character on such forums — she has come to represent an entire audience that has hitherto received NO representation at all. Look at the reactions in the disabled community to news reports on treatments that give false hope to “healing” paralysis — they tend to be pretty damn negative.

If DC strips Barbara of all that she has become as a character and all that she has come to represent for marginalized communities who have NO ONE they can relate to in the stories they love to read, then yes, it IS a big “fuck you” to those audiences. It’s saying that their support of the character and adoption of her as a fictional representative doesn’t matter. It’s saying that, while other communities are (finally) starting to get more representation, the disabled community doesn’t deserve the same. It’s saying that everything that Barbara has become as a paralyzed woman — a hero in her own right FAR more powerful than Batgirl and, in many ways, more powerful than Batman or Superman — means nothing. It’s negating a history that has come to mean so much to people who get no representation anywhere else, painting over it like it never happened. It’s saying that there’s something wrong with existing as a capable person who happens to have mobility issues, so that existence needs to be wiped away.

I hope it isn’t Babs. I hope it’s a fakeout.

Kate Fatale, always amazing, her comment says it so much better than I ever could.  (via georgethecat)

“Turn it off, I’m breaking in not out. This is River Song back in her cell. Oh, and I’ll take breakfast at the usual time, thank you.”

River Song, ‘A good man goes to war’

(via popsiclemelts)

FLAWLESS.

(via letseyx)

(Source: your-bespoke-psychopath)

A reading I did last night using my new focused clarification method.

Review: Good Omens

Good OmensGood Omens by Terry Pratchett

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I really enjoyed this book especially the interactions between Aziraphale and Crowley. I would preferred more of these than scenes with Them.



The end is a little confusing but all ends are tied up. The book is funny amusing and enjoyable. There’s something very British about this book and the world created is one I would like to visit again especially if it featured one of the best double acts in literature ie Aziraphale and Crowley.



View all my reviews

archive older ›
Ask
theme by Conkers